#COVIDIOTS, #Scamdemic, Coronavirus

NO SHIT SHERLOCK | GAME OVER! 22 Researchers, Doctors & Academics conclude the PCR test is USELESS!

I’d like to think that a study like this would mean “GAME OVER”, but unfortunately their sick game is actually just beginning. This has far and away been the largest & most despicable hoax ever pulled on humanity. But rather than rising up and pushing back against this insanity, the majority of the population has rolled over & submitted to the lunacy like brain dead sheepletards. Apparently, implied authority doesn’t come from credentials, science, factual data or common sense. But rather from the frequency of one’s appearances on television. We’ve had to listen to a talentless software developer try to impose himself as the top authority figure on anything “Scamdemic” related in Bill Gates. This whole ordeal has turned into a circus of a clown show, and unfortunately it’s us who ends up coming out of this looking like the biggest clowns of all for ever having listened to a single word any of these tools ever had to say in the first place. We should have immediately told this chode to get lost at the very beginning. We were too caught up in dividing ourselves along even more pre-fabricated lines that they had prepared for us.

Save yourself. That’s all u can do. I’ve put in a valiant effort in trying to wake up those around me up to this point, but for the most part its all been in vain.

I love how at the end of this thread the author found it necessary to plead with us for an actual public reaction. An outcry that by now he should realize is never going to manifest itself in any substantial fashion. The public has officially gone brain dead. I called their “time of death” at around May of this year.


22 Researchers, Doctors & Academics conclude the PCR test is USELESS!

The probability of a PCR test positive result, using a 35+ cycle threshold, being infectious, is . .



Full video:


On 23 jan @c_drosten et al published their paper describing the de facto industry standard protocol for detection of #SARSCoV2 by PCR

Now an intl. team of top experts asks for RETRACTION. The protocol is fatally flawed: it can NOT DETECT the virus.

#retractionpaper #PCRGATE

Implications ARE HUGE.

The Corman-Drosten PCR protocol is used in an estimated 70% of all PCR test kits world wide. Because it has now been invalidated much of ALL the #SARSCoV2 diagnostic testing, research (including vaccine research) is either invalid or in need of review.

The protocol was published even before any real virus isolate became available. It was based on in silico (theoretical) sequences of the viral genome. To date no validation has been performed by the authorship based on isolated SARS-CoV-2 viruses or full length RNA thereof.

The original paper ‘Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR’ can be found here:



The retraction paper (‘external peer review’) ‘Review Report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020’ can be found here: http://cormandrostenreview.com/report/


The team (@BorgerPieter @MichaelYeadon3 @Bobby_Network @Kevin_McKernan @Thomas_Binder and others) found 10 fatal flaws.

Below a list.

Extremely high concentration of primes (1), making the test non-specific.

Six unspecified wobbly positions (2), introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations.

The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments (3).

Incompatible annealing temperatures (4).

A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative (5).

The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level (6).

The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses (7).

The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP (standard operating procedure) (8).

The Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed (9).

Many severe conflicts of interest (10).

We would like to thank @BorgerPieter @Bobby_Network @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @Thomas_Binder @hommel_b @KPCResearch @ClareCraigPath @angelovalidiya @MarjoleinDvK and all other authors for this heroic act of science.

It is up to us to make it count! FREEDOM!

We are also awaiting a reaction from the main authors of the flawed protocol @c_drosten @MarionKoopmans @vmcorman

Can we have a public reaction please?

Mega PCR test thread


Saying “make this viral” often doesn’t age well, but I’ll risk it this time.

Please, everyone, RT this new ‘trailer’ for a longer video I just put on You Tube to AS MANY Influencers as you can.

Full video:

%d bloggers like this: